Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow companies can identify new value pools and build business models that combine differentiated customer value with scalable economics.
Read articleFocus
Every strategic initiative should have a credible path from action to operational outcome and from that outcome to measurable economic value.
The most useful venture plan identifies the small number of assumptions whose failure would make the opportunity economically or strategically unattractive.
Strategic challenges
Revenue may remain healthy after technology, customer behaviour or competitive alternatives have begun weakening a product's future role.
Pricing, channels, delivery and cost structure can each appear rational while producing unattractive economics when combined.
POV
A company can gain share and still lose economically when rivalry forces pricing, investment or service levels beyond sustainable returns.
A venture that loses value with every additional customer has a business-model problem, not a growth problem.
Strategic impact
Choosing which customers, attributes or economics not to optimise can create a more coherent and defensible basis for advantage.
A company that solved product-market fit may immediately encounter distribution, economics, leadership or operational constraints.
What we observe
We frequently see outlet counts and geographic coverage expand while revenue density, margin quality and partner economics deteriorate.
We frequently see strategies built around expected customer outcomes while competitor retaliation, imitation and repositioning remain implicit.