Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow companies can identify new value pools and build business models that combine differentiated customer value with scalable economics.
Read articleFocus
A large segment can still be strategically unattractive when acquisition cost, price sensitivity or weak retention undermine its economics.
Ownership should have a strategic rationale beyond history, reported revenue or the cost and inconvenience of changing the portfolio.
Strategic challenges
Competitors frequently converge on similar promises because communication evolves faster than the underlying business model or capabilities.
A capability creates competitive advantage only when its value, scarcity and economics remain superior to the alternatives rivals can deploy.
POV
Predictability has little strategic value when retention is weak, servicing costs are high or the model transfers excessive risk to the provider.
Defensible positioning must eventually connect to capabilities, economics, assets or choices that are harder to replicate than language.
Strategic impact
A strategy that leaves investment, talent and management attention essentially unchanged may be describing ambition rather than directing action.
Store size, assortment, service model and location type can change capital intensity, customer missions and network economics.
What we observe
We frequently see portfolios of initiatives presented as strategy without explicit choices about markets, advantage, economics or trade-offs.
We frequently see strategies built around expected customer outcomes while competitor retaliation, imitation and repositioning remain implicit.