Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow turnaround strategies can rebuild competitive position by resetting the portfolio, operating priorities and sources of future growth.
Read articleFocus
A positioning strategy becomes meaningful only when the answer changes customer preference under realistic competitive conditions.
Ownership should have a strategic rationale beyond history, reported revenue or the cost and inconvenience of changing the portfolio.
Strategic challenges
Budgets reveal which businesses the organisation actually believes in more clearly than portfolio narratives or strategic aspirations.
Pricing, channels, delivery and cost structure can each appear rational while producing unattractive economics when combined.
POV
Corporate strategy should ask whether the parent is the best owner, not simply whether the underlying business is attractive.
Defensible positioning must eventually connect to capabilities, economics, assets or choices that are harder to replicate than language.
Strategic impact
Shared customers, capabilities or infrastructure create value only when their benefits outweigh coordination, compromise and managerial overhead.
Moving from transactions to subscriptions or outcomes affects cash flow, risk, capabilities and customer relationships far beyond pricing.
What we observe
We frequently see long stakeholder lists without clear prioritisation of which relationships can materially affect strategic outcomes.
We frequently see strategies built around expected customer outcomes while competitor retaliation, imitation and repositioning remain implicit.