M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Integration is where the deal thesis gets tested
How post-merger operating choices, synergy discipline and organizational readiness determine whether expected transaction value reaches performance.
Read articleFocus
Build, partner or buy is a choice about control, speed and strategic dependence
Different routes create different economics, ownership rights, capability requirements and long-term constraints.
Operational diligence tests whether the target can deliver the economics being bought
It examines processes, capacity, cost, supply, systems and execution constraints behind the financial and commercial case.
Strategic challenges
Which assumptions could cause the deal thesis to fail?
The challenge is identifying where downside comes from before valuation, momentum and confirmation bias narrow the decision.
Which businesses no longer justify their place in the portfolio?
The challenge is separating temporary underperformance from assets whose strategic fit, economics or ownership logic has structurally weakened.
POV
A cross-border deal is never just a domestic deal in another currency
Jurisdiction changes what can be owned, integrated, governed and extracted from the transaction.
Technical debt becomes deal debt when the buyer inherits it without pricing it
Technology quality should be reflected in valuation and integration assumptions, not discovered as an unavoidable cost after close.
Strategic impact
Failure analysis makes critical deal assumptions easier to challenge
Testing downside pathways helps leadership identify where the transaction is most exposed to execution, market or integration risk.
Strategic diligence clarifies whether the target strengthens enterprise direction
Testing fit and alternatives helps leadership judge whether the transaction improves strategic position or simply adds another asset.
What we observe
Technology diligence often inventories systems without testing strategic consequence
A long application list adds little unless technical weaknesses are linked to growth, integration, cost or operational risk.
Synergy plans often count value before anyone owns the actions required to create it
Headline targets can survive diligence while operational accountability, timing and implementation cost remain poorly defined.