Due diligence for assets that are changing underneath the deal
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleFocus
Acquisition readiness tests whether the buyer can absorb what it wants to acquire
Strategic fit matters only if capital, leadership capacity, operating model and integration capability can support the transaction.
M&A strategy should begin with portfolio logic, not with available targets
Acquisitions create value when they support explicit choices about where the enterprise wants to compete and allocate capital.
Strategic challenges
Why should this business be owned rather than built, partnered with or ignored?
The challenge is proving that acquisition is the best strategic route, not simply the fastest route to a desired capability.
Where does M&A genuinely improve the portfolio?
The challenge is identifying where acquisition changes strategic position faster or better than organic investment, partnership or exit.
POV
Historical growth is evidence, not proof of a durable business model
The relevant question is whether the economic mechanisms behind performance remain credible after the deal closes.
A full acquisition pipeline is not evidence of an M&A strategy
Strategy exists when leadership knows what it wants to own, why ownership matters and when the right answer is not to transact.
Strategic impact
A clear separation model reduces hidden dependencies before transition begins
Mapping shared services, assets and systems helps define what transfers, what remains and what must be rebuilt.
Commercial diligence makes the revenue thesis more explicit and testable
Independent evidence on customers, markets and competition helps buyers assess growth quality and downside exposure.
What we observe
Synergy plans often count value before anyone owns the actions required to create it
Headline targets can survive diligence while operational accountability, timing and implementation cost remain poorly defined.
Buy-and-build programs often acquire faster than the platform can integrate
Deal cadence can outrun systems, management capacity and operating-model maturity, leaving value trapped across disconnected assets.