M&A strategy when the obvious targets are gone
How companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleRelated macro
M&A strategy
Shape M&A strategy from portfolio rationale and target priorities through diligence, value creation and integration.
Discover the macroEditorial overview
Articles
Due diligence for assets that are changing underneath the deal
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleFocus
Strategic diligence asks whether the transaction still makes sense under scrutiny
It tests fit, competitive logic, alternatives, downside and whether ownership advances the buyer's broader strategic position.
Target intelligence looks beyond reported performance to strategic relevance
The objective is to understand ownership, positioning, capabilities, dependencies and the factors that may alter a target's attractiveness.
Strategic challenges
Can the target's operations support the performance assumed in the deal?
The challenge is identifying hidden constraints that may limit growth, margins, service or integration after ownership changes.
Does the deal remain strategically compelling after the assumptions are challenged?
The challenge is testing acquisition logic independently of valuation, process momentum and management enthusiasm.
POV
Buying a capability is not always the smartest way to access it
Ownership should be justified by strategic necessity, not by the assumption that control automatically creates more value.
A synergy without an owner, action and baseline is not value; it is optimism
Deal economics should include only benefits that can be traced to specific changes the combined business can realistically execute.
Strategic impact
Commercial diligence makes the revenue thesis more explicit and testable
Independent evidence on customers, markets and competition helps buyers assess growth quality and downside exposure.
Portfolio-led M&A makes acquisition priorities more selective and coherent
Clear strategic gaps and timing criteria help leadership pursue transactions that reinforce portfolio direction rather than distract from it.
What we observe
Target assessments often extrapolate recent growth without testing its underlying cause
Strong historical results can conceal customer concentration, weak differentiation or favorable conditions that may not persist.
Operational diligence often focuses on cost opportunities and misses execution fragility
Apparent efficiency can conceal capacity bottlenecks, key-person dependence, weak controls or deferred investment.