Due diligence for assets that are changing underneath the deal
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
Why commercial, operational and technology diligence must increasingly test future scenarios rather than validate historical performance.
Read articleHow companies can build a stronger acquisition radar by connecting portfolio logic, target intelligence and strategic fit before competition intensifies.
Read articleFocus
Strategic fit matters only if capital, leadership capacity, operating model and integration capability can support the transaction.
The logic must connect strategic need, target characteristics, economics and the specific advantage of acquiring rather than building or partnering.
Strategic challenges
The challenge is identifying where downside comes from before valuation, momentum and confirmation bias narrow the decision.
The challenge is identifying hidden constraints that may limit growth, margins, service or integration after ownership changes.
POV
The revenue case should be supported by observable customer and market behavior, not by internal consistency alone.
No amount of financial or operational analysis can rescue a transaction whose strategic logic was weak from the beginning.
Strategic impact
Clear strategic gaps and timing criteria help leadership pursue transactions that reinforce portfolio direction rather than distract from it.
Explicit assumptions make it easier to test fit, alternatives and the conditions required for the acquisition to create value.
What we observe
Once deal momentum builds, teams can become better at defending the thesis than questioning whether the transaction should happen.
Reporting lines can change quickly while customer, technology and operating issues that determine deal economics remain unresolved.