What We Frequently Observe

Companies often relocate supply without testing the full economics of resilience

Moving closer or into friendly jurisdictions can reduce one exposure while creating higher costs and new dependencies elsewhere.

2026 1 min read Author: KeynesMoore

Registered access

Related macro

Discover the macro

Articles

How subsidies, export controls and state intervention can alter the relative attractiveness of markets, technologies and investment locations.

Why concentrated exposure to critical technologies, materials and infrastructure is becoming a board-level issue across industries.

Focus

The issue is how deteriorating security conditions alter operations, people, logistics, assets and market access.

Political stress, institutional weakness and social disruption can alter operating continuity, demand and capital exposure.

Strategic challenges

The challenge is identifying where concentration and sovereign control create exposure that ordinary procurement analysis misses.

The challenge is identifying activities that may become incompatible across competing regulatory and geopolitical blocs.

POV

True redundancy requires understanding shared infrastructure dependencies, not simply increasing the number of counterparties.

Attention should follow business consequence, not media intensity; not every global shock deserves the same management response.

Strategic impact

Assessing policy direction and network dependencies helps management test sourcing, production and investment alternatives.

Mapping critical dependencies against policy regimes helps management assess sourcing, investment and market-access implications.

What we observe

Compliance may be technically correct while sourcing, investment or product plans remain vulnerable to geopolitical restriction.

Low-probability exposure is easily ignored when alternatives have not been tested and access has historically been reliable.