Strategy in a world of overlapping disruptions
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleRelated macro
Articles
How leaders can make sharper choices on where to compete, where to invest and what to stop when multiple structural shifts hit at once.
Read articleHow companies can identify new value pools and build business models that combine differentiated customer value with scalable economics.
Read articleFocus
A strategy becomes meaningful when priorities impose consequences on where capital, leadership attention and capabilities will not be allocated.
Network growth creates value only when incremental demand, unit economics and strategic coverage justify the capital and complexity added.
Strategic challenges
Broad priorities become ambiguous initiatives when organisations do not define what must materially change for the strategy to work.
The harder problem is concentrating enough talent and capital behind a limited number of opportunities to generate meaningful evidence.
POV
Predictability has little strategic value when retention is weak, servicing costs are high or the model transfers excessive risk to the provider.
A B2B strategy becomes stronger when the value proposition is distinctive enough to be highly relevant to some customers and deliberately less relevant to others.
Strategic impact
A growth product, retention product and harvesting product should not receive resources according to the same assumptions or success criteria.
Stakeholders infer corporate priorities from investment, incentives and behaviour long before they accept the language used to describe them.
What we observe
We frequently see development capacity committed to accumulated requests without a current strategic rationale for why those priorities still matter.
We frequently see strategy focused on outperforming incumbents while deeper changes are altering where future profit will be created.