Competitive intelligence in an era of faster strategic moves
How companies can build earlier visibility on competitors, market shifts and emerging threats before those signals become consensus.
Read articleWhere Is the Value Actually Moving?
Revenue growth and value creation are not the same movement. A market can expand while profit migrates from products to services, ownership to access, manufacturing to software, or established customers to a small emerging segment. The strategic question is not who sells more units, but who captures the additional cash flow after capital, risk and bargaining power are considered.
Start by rebuilding the market as value pools rather than industry labels. For each segment, measure revenue, gross contribution, operating cost, working capital, capital intensity and the party controlling price or customer access. Compare change in absolute economic profit, not only margin percentage: a high-margin niche can be less consequential than a moderate-margin pool adding substantial scale.
Price effects must be separated from real activity. The OECD�s 2026 global value-chain dataset covers 80 economies and 50 industries through 2024 and uses previous-year prices to distinguish changes in volume from inflation and relative prices. The principle applies inside a market: reported growth driven by price can obscure falling units, changing mix or a transfer of value to upstream inputs.
Then identify the mechanism of migration. Value moves when scarcity changes, a standard commoditises a feature, regulation reallocates cost, data improves a service or an intermediary gains control of demand. Test the pattern with customer cohorts, competitor economics, transaction prices and investment flows. A credible shift should appear in several of these before it is accepted as structural.
The output is a forward value-pool map with ranges, not a single forecast. Show where incremental profit may accumulate, what must be true, the capital required to participate and the signposts that would invalidate the thesis. Strategy follows the movement by changing where to build capability, place options or exit�not by extrapolating the largest revenue category.
Related macro
Articles
How companies can build earlier visibility on competitors, market shifts and emerging threats before those signals become consensus.
Read articleHow stronger collection, source validation and challenge mechanisms can reduce executive exposure to weak assumptions and misleading signals.
Read articleFocus
The company selling the product is not always the actor with the strongest influence over discovery, adoption or the final buying decision.
Revenue can obscure the underlying mechanism that creates economic value, particularly when products subsidise one another or monetisation occurs elsewhere.
Strategic challenges
As content is reproduced, summarised and generated at scale, identifying where a claim originated becomes increasingly difficult and valuable.
Capital, talent, acquisitions and operating resources can provide stronger evidence of strategic priorities than public statements alone.
POV
Strategic advantage depends on recognising changing demand before products, pricing and positioning become misaligned with it.
A weaker operator with fundamentally better economics can become more consequential than an incumbent executing the old model exceptionally well.
Strategic impact
Performance becomes strategically meaningful when its underlying economics reveal whether momentum can persist without increasingly expensive support.
A rapidly expanding segment may still offer weak economics when competition, capital intensity or customer power absorb most of the value.
What we observe
We frequently see productivity or cost comparisons made without understanding the operating configurations responsible for the difference.
We frequently see prices, margins and growth compared without examining the structural model that makes those outcomes economically possible.